Published on Nov 10, 2015

Increasing demand for information exchange is a characteristic of modern civilisation. The transfer of information from the source to its destination has to be done in such a way that the quality of the received information should be as close as possible to the quality of the transmitted information.

The information to be transmitted can be machine generated (e.g., images, computer data) or human generated (e.g., speech). Regardless of its source, the information must be translated into a set of signals optimized for the channel over which we want to send it. The first step is to eliminate the redundant part in order to maximize the information transmission rate. This is achieved by the source encoder block

In order to ensure the secrecy of the transmitted information, an encryption scheme must be used. The data must also be protected against perturbations introduced by the communication channel which could lead to misinterpretation of the transmitted message at the receiving end. This protection can be achieved through error control strategies: forward error correction (FEC), i.e., using error correcting codes that are able to correct errors at the receiving end, or automatic repeat request (ARQ) systems.

The modulator block generates a signal suitable for the transmission channel. In the traditional approach, the demodulator block from Figure 1-1 makes a "hard" decision for the received symbol and passes it to the error control decoder block. This is equivalent, in the case of a two level modulation scheme, to decide which of two logical values, say -1 and +1, was transmitted.

No information is passed on about how reliable the hard decision is. For example, when a +1 is output by the demodulator, it is impossible to say if it was received as a 0.2 or a 0.99 or a 1.56 value at the input to the demodulator block. Therefore, the information concerning the confidence into the demodulated output is lost in the case of a "hard" decision demodulator.

The capacity of a channel, which was first introduced 50 years ago by Claude Shannon, is the theoretical maximum data rate that can be supported by the channel with vanishing error probability. In this discussion, we restrict our attention to the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel.Here, x is modulated symbol modelled by arandom process with zero mean and variance Es (Es is the energy per symbol). For the specific case of antipodal signalling 2 , x = + Es 1/2 . z is sample from an additive white Gaussian noise process with zero mean and variance N0/2.

The capacity of the AWGN channel is given by :bits per channel use. Signalling at rates close to capacity is achieved in practice by error correction coding. An error correction code maps data sequences of k bits to code words of n symbols. Because n>k, the code word contains structured redundancy.

The code rate, r = k/n is a measure of the spectral efficiency of the code. In order to achieve reliable communications, the code rate cannot exceed the channel capacity ( r < C).

The minimum theoretical signal-to-noise ratio 3 Eb/N0 required to achieve arbitrarily reliable communications 4 can be found by rearranging equation (2) This is the minimum Eb/N0 required for any arbitrary distribution for the input x.

Equation (3) can be satisfied with equality only if the input is Gaussian distributed. If the input is antipodal instead of Gaussian, slightly higher Eb/N0 is required. Plots of the minimum Eb/N0 required to achieve channel capacity as a function of code rate r are given in Figure 1 for both Gaussian distributed inputs and antipodal inputs.

Are you interested in this topic.Then mail to us immediately to get the full report.
email :- |

- Voice Portals
- Voice Over Internet Protocol
- Voice Morphing
- VoCable
- Visible Light Communication
- Virtual Retinal Display